How do you reduce hallucinations in RAG systems? (ANSWERED)
Hallucination in RAG systems is the #1 production failure mode cited in AI engineering interviews. Your interviewer wants a systematic debugging framework — not a list of buzzwords. Learn how to measure faithfulness, fix retrieval precision, and layer mitigations the way senior engineers at Databricks and Meta actually ship RAG.

TL;DR — Quick Answer
Improve retrieval precision with hybrid search and re-ranking, add citation requirements, implement faithfulness checks, and tune chunk overlap and metadata filtering.
The Interview Question
Your RAG pipeline still produces hallucinated answers 10% of the time. Walk through your debugging and mitigation strategy.
Deep Explanation
Start by measuring hallucination rate with a golden eval set. Common root causes: poor retrieval (wrong chunks), context overflow (truncation), and model ignoring context.
Mitigations: (1) Hybrid search (BM25 + dense) for better recall, (2) Cross-encoder re-ranking, (3) Prompt engineering with 'answer only from context' instructions, (4) Citation enforcement, (5) Self-consistency or LLM-as-judge faithfulness scoring, (6) Metadata filters to narrow retrieval scope.
Sign in to unlock full answer
Get deep explanations, PDF export & all RAG questions